<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>energywatch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com</link>
	<description>energy.  economics.  simplified.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:15:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>June Natural Gas/Electricity Market Update</title>
		<link>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/06/june-natural-gaselectricity-market-update/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/06/june-natural-gaselectricity-market-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of June 7th, the following fundamental(s) are bullish:

Power Generation 



EIA projects 3.8% increase in NG consumption, driven by higher usage among utilities and industrial consumers



Structural shift has taken place in the power market, providing gas-fired generation a larger position in the power supply stack

Coal fired generation giving way to NG fueled generation, cleaner burning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>As of June 7th, the following fundamental(s) are bullish:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Power Generation </strong>
<ul>
<li>
<div>
<div>EIA projects 3.8% increase in NG consumption, driven by higher usage among utilities and industrial consumers</div>
</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>Structural shift has taken place in the power market, providing gas-fired generation a larger position in the power supply stack</div>
</li>
<li>Coal fired generation giving way to NG fueled generation, cleaner burning fuel<span id="more-231"></span></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Industrial Demand </strong>
<ul>
<li>
<div>EIA&#8217;s natural-gas-weighted industrial production index (a measure of industrial activity in natural-gas-intensive industries) showed a year-over-year increase of 6.8 percent during the first quarter of 2010 and is forecast to rise by 5 percent on average for the entire year</div>
</li>
<li>All else equal, further gains in industrial demand and power generation demand will slow or halt further declines in natural gas/electricity prices</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Weather </strong>
<ul>
<li>
<div>Above-normal temperatures in the eastern and central U.S. over the next few weeks are expected to bolster demand for NG to generate electricity cooling</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>Active 2010 Atlantic hurricane season expected due to dissipation of El Nino, an abnormal warming of surface ocean waters in the eastern tropical Pacific that causes a change in global weather patterns</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) outlook points to a 70% probability of 14 to 23 named storms, including 8 to 14 hurricanes and 3 to 7 major hurricanes</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>U.S. Gulf produces about 11% of total domestic NG output</div>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The following fundamentals are neutral:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Canadian Imports</strong>
<ul>
<li>Imports to remain depressed due to decreased Canadian production</li>
<li>Drilling most likely to pick up when NG reaches $5.00/mmBtu level</li>
<li>Currently at 10 year lows</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Technical Outlook</strong>
<ul>
<li>Prices broke out below the $5.00 resistance level in mid-February and have held there ever since, has been trading between $3.81 and $4.50 since March 18, 2010</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>
<div>Prices cannot hold under the $4.00 level, even as speculators increased their net short position this past April to the highest level in the past decade</div>
</li>
<li>Speculators have remained net short 140k to 205k contracts since June 2009</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>LNG Imports </strong>
<ul>
<li>
<div>Not expected to increase substantially because of South American and Asian demand and higher value in UK/Euro zone</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>EIA projects only a .4 bcf/day increase in imports Y-o-Y</div>
</li>
<li>LNG now makes up 10% of global NG supply, enables greater price competition</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The following fundamentals are bearish:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>NG Storage</strong>
<ul>
<li>As of June 3rd storage report, supply levels at 2.357 trillion cubic feet, 14.9% above the 5 year average</li>
<li>
<div>Gas surplus puts pressure on prices by easing concerns over short-lived supply interruptions or demand spikes</div>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-232" href="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/06/june-natural-gaselectricity-market-update/ngs/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-232" src="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/NGS.gif" alt="" width="637" height="330" /></a></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>US Production</strong>
<ul>
<li>
<div>Total US gas drilling rig counts have increased by 210 since the end of 2009, at 967 rigs as of May 28, 28% increase Y-o-Y</div>
</li>
<li>Shale Gas Production
<ul>
<li>
<div>Unconventional gas formations located in shale rock formations</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>Rely on horizontal drilling and “fracking” (pumping water/sand into well to blast out gas), new technology means gas above $4.00/MMBtu covers cost of drilling existing wells</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>Better bet than oil – typical gas well costs $4 million and is virtually assured of success.  In Gulf of Mexico, oil companies spend $300 million to drill deep-water wells and still come up empty</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>According to EIA, shale gas is largest source of growth in NG supply</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>Potential to supply 40% of total U.S. NG production</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>Driven by nation’s growing need for energy and high NG prices in recent years, interest in shale gas has been ever increasing</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>When NG reached a high of about $16/ MMBtu in late 2005 and $14/MMBtu in July 2008, there was a massive influx of lease purchases which drove companies with cash into a bidding frenzy</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>Despite NG prices falling 75% since then, those companies are forced to continue drilling plans formulated for much higher market prices in order to protect their lease investments, even though the domestic market does not need all of this NG right now</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>If a well is not drilled on a new lease within 3 to 5 years, then control of the mineral rights reverts to the owner, the lease is void, and the company loses their investment</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>Companies stuck between having to continue to supply the market to keep their lease and protect their investment and hammering their own market by over-supplying at a time of minimal demand and a slow economic recovery</div>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Additional Geopolitical Factors Affecting Prices</strong><strong>:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>
<div>Chakib Khelil, Algeria’s energy minister and president of the Gas Exporting Countries Forum (which does not include USA or Australia, holds over 70% of world’s current proven NG reserves), had said it may emulate OPEC, which typically shuts the spigots to boost prices</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>Announced on 4/19/10 that production cuts have been ruled out by risk of losing market share to countries like USA and Australia</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>Production cuts were already denounced by 2 of the forum’s heavyweights, Qatar and Russia, who are both increasing market reach</div>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Additional Environmental Factors Affecting Prices:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>
<div>Offshore natural gas production was not directly affected by the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and related recovery efforts</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>About 6 million cubic feet per day of offshore production shut-ins, comprising less than 0.1 percent of total natural gas production in the Gulf</div>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Additional Regulatory Risks Affecting Prices:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Oil Spill and Shale Gas
<ul>
<li>
<div>New regulatory risks and uncertainty following the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico are making on-shore production more attractive</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>The spill could be a boon for domestic shale gas as the U.S. looks to reduce its dependence on foreign oil while easing the burden on the inherently higher risk of deepwater drilling in the Gulf</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>Natural Gas offers a cleaner, lower-risk solution to nation’s energy demand</div>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<div>Energy Bill</div>
<ul>
<li>
<div>President Barack Obama vowed to find votes to pass an energy bill in “the coming months” after the Gulf Oil catastrophe</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>Plans to advocate rolling back billions of dollars in tax breaks to oil companies and expanding the nation’s fleet of nuclear power plants and tapping into natural gas reserves</div>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-233" href="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/06/june-natural-gaselectricity-market-update/fundamental-see-saw-2/"><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-233" src="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Fundamental-See-saw-1024x681.png" alt="" width="433" height="287" /></a></p>
<p>In summary, there are factors pulling prices in both directions.  Traders are weighing weather driven demand and the hurricane forecast against the abundant storage numbers and US production.  The surplus of gas in underground storage as well as the continued shale gas drilling should keep a cap on major price increases in the near term.</p>
<p><strong>Front Month NYMEX Natural Gas Vs. Zone J LMP:</strong></p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-236" href="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/06/june-natural-gaselectricity-market-update/ng-vs-zone-j/"><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-236" src="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/NG-vs.-Zone-J-1024x768.png" alt="" width="623" height="465" /></a></p>
<p><strong>DISCLAIMER:  Past performance is not indicative of future results.  Electric prices are not 100% correlated to natural gas prices.  Geopolitical, economic, and weather related supply and demand spikes can significantly affect natural gas and electricity prices.</strong>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li><a href='http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/04/april-natural-gaselectricity-market-update/' title='April Natural Gas/Electricity Market Update'>April Natural Gas/Electricity Market Update</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/03/natural-gaselectricity-market-update/' title='Natural Gas/Electricity Market Update'>Natural Gas/Electricity Market Update</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/06/june-natural-gaselectricity-market-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April Natural Gas/Electricity Market Update</title>
		<link>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/04/april-natural-gaselectricity-market-update/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/04/april-natural-gaselectricity-market-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of April 19th, the following fundamental(s) are bullish:

Power Generation 


NG demand for electric power generation increased 7% week-over-week


Structural shift has taken place in the power market, providing gas-fired generation a larger position in the power supply stack

Coal fired generation giving way to NG fueled generation, cleaner burning fuel



The following fundamentals are neutral:

Canadian Imports

Imports to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>As of April 19th, the following fundamental(s) are bullish:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Power Generation </strong>
<ul>
<li>
<div>NG demand for electric power generation increased 7% week-over-week</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>Structural shift has taken place in the power market, providing gas-fired generation a larger position in the power supply stack</div>
</li>
<li>Coal fired generation giving way to NG fueled generation, cleaner burning fuel<span id="more-208"></span></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The following fundamentals are neutral:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Canadian Imports</strong>
<ul>
<li>Imports to remain depressed due to decreased Canadian production</li>
<li>Drilling most likely to pick up when NG reaches $5.00/mmBtu level</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Weather </strong>
<ul>
<li>Mild spring-like weather early in the shoulder-month season</li>
<li>Little demand due to weather, no need for natural gas powered space heating or generation for air conditioning</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Industrial Demand </strong>
<ul>
<li>Less than 1% Y-o-Y increase</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The following fundamentals are bearish:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>LNG Imports </strong>
<ul>
<li>Imports reached an all time high on Jan. 8 due to weather driven demand</li>
<li>Expected to rise 45%in 2010 due to new supplies from Russia, Yemen, Qatar, Indonesia, and Peru</li>
<li>LNG now makes up 10% of global NG supply, enables greater price competition</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>NG Storage</strong>
<ul>
<li>As of April 15th storage report, supply levels at 1.756 trillion cubic feet, 16.3% above the 5 year average</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Working-Gas-in-Storage.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-209" src="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Working-Gas-in-Storage.png" alt="" width="641" height="333" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Storage-Injections-and-Withdrawals.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-210" src="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Storage-Injections-and-Withdrawals.png" alt="" width="634" height="350" /></a></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Technical Outlook</strong>
<ul>
<li>Prices broke out below the $5.00 resistance level in mid-February and have held there ever since, has been trading between $3.81 and $4.30 for the past 3 weeks</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Speculators increased their net-short position for the week ending April 13, highest level of short positions in past decade</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>US Production</strong>
<ul>
<li>Total US gas drilling rig counts have increased by 214 since the end of 2009, at 973 rigs as of last week</li>
<li>15th consecutive weekly increase, 28% increase since end of 2009</li>
<li>Production from shale gas formations has been able to offset production losses from conventional wells</li>
<li>
<div>Last month EIA forecasted a 2.7% decrease in production, now they are forecasting a .7% increase due to the increased number of drilling rigs</div>
</li>
<li>NG production up 10.6% from 2007-2009, while consumption was down 1%</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Type-of-Drilling-Rig.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-211" src="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Type-of-Drilling-Rig.png" alt="" width="361" height="270" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/NG-Drilling-by-Trajectory.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-212" src="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/NG-Drilling-by-Trajectory.png" alt="" width="635" height="351" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Additional Factors Affecting Prices:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>
<div>Chakib Khelil, Algeria’s energy minister and president of the Gas Exporting Countries Forum (which does not include USA or Australia, holds over 70% of world’s current proven NG reserves), had said it may emulate OPEC, which typically shuts the spigots to boost prices</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>Announced on 4/19/10 that production cuts have been ruled out by risk of losing market share to countries like USA and Australia</div>
</li>
<li>
<div>Production cuts were already denounced by 2 of the forum’s heavyweights, Qatar and Russia, who are both increasing market reach</div>
</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Fundamental-See-saw.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-100" src="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Fundamental-See-saw-300x184.png" alt="" width="359" height="220" /></a></p>
<p>In summary, there are more bearish factors than bullish.  The weak shoulder-season fundamentals should keep a cap on prices in the near term.</p>
<p><strong>DISCLAIMER:  Past performance is not indicative of future results.  Electric prices are not 100% correlated to natural gas prices.  Geopolitical, economic, and weather related supply and demand spikes can significantly affect natural gas and electricity prices.<br />
</strong>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li><a href='http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/06/june-natural-gaselectricity-market-update/' title='June Natural Gas/Electricity Market Update'>June Natural Gas/Electricity Market Update</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/03/natural-gaselectricity-market-update/' title='Natural Gas/Electricity Market Update'>Natural Gas/Electricity Market Update</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/04/april-natural-gaselectricity-market-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYSERDA Pledges $100 Million for Data Center Efficiency Measures &#8211; Application Deadline: April 29</title>
		<link>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/04/nyserda-pledges-100-million-for-data-center-efficiency-measures-application-deadline-april-29/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/04/nyserda-pledges-100-million-for-data-center-efficiency-measures-application-deadline-april-29/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Lembo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYSERDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under a new program being offered by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) targeting data centers and industrial customers, qualified applicants can receive a grant for up $5 million for energy efficiency and productivity measures.  The grant, called the &#8220;2010 NYS Data Center Energy Efficiency Leadership Award,&#8221; will be awarded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under a new program being offered by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) targeting data centers and industrial customers, qualified applicants can receive a grant for up $5 million for energy efficiency and productivity measures.  <span id="more-192"></span>The grant, called the &#8220;2010 NYS Data Center Energy Efficiency Leadership Award,&#8221; will be awarded based on projected energy savings at a rate of 16&cent; per KWH for facilities located in Con Edison territory and 12&cent; per KWH for facilities located in the rest of the state.</p>
<p>In order to be considered, projects must meet a $10,000 minimum incentive (62,500 KWH for Con Ed and 83,333 KWH or more for the rest of the state), and no award shall be given for more than half the total project cost.  NYSERDA has indicated it will pay 60 percent of the award upon installation and the rest after the project has been verified through a Measurement and Verification plan of up to two years, developed in collaboration with the applicant.</p>
<p>Eligible projects for data centers could include, but are not limited to:</p>
<ul>
<li>improved air-flow management</li>
<li>applications management strategies</li>
<li>virtualization</li>
</ul>
<p>For more information regarding the program please <a href="http://energywatch-inc.com/contactus.php">contact us</a> or visit <a href="http://www.nyserda.org/programs/Existing_Facilities/industrial.html">nyserda.org</a>.
<ul class='related_post'>
<li>No Related Posts</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/04/nyserda-pledges-100-million-for-data-center-efficiency-measures-application-deadline-april-29/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Natural Gas/Electricity Market Update</title>
		<link>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/03/natural-gaselectricity-market-update/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/03/natural-gaselectricity-market-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Commodities such as natural gas, electricity, other energies, precious metals, grains, etc., are all driven primarily by the supply/demand relationship, and secondarily by speculation by traders/institutions/market makers.  We cannot really forecast or predict speculation, but we can attempt to track the factors that drive the supply and demand of commodities.   To better [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commodities such as natural gas, electricity, other energies, precious metals, grains, etc., are all driven primarily by the supply/demand relationship, and secondarily by speculation by traders/institutions/market makers.  We cannot really forecast or predict speculation, but we can attempt to track the factors that drive the supply and demand of commodities.   To better understand the natural gas market (and electricity market, which is correlated to NG movements), we track the following 8 market factors:<span id="more-92"></span></p>
<p><strong>Supply Side:</strong><br />
1.	Canadian Imports<br />
2.	Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Imports<br />
3.	US Production<br />
4.	NG Storage</p>
<p><strong>Demand Side:</strong><br />
5.	Industrial Demand<br />
6.	Power Generation<br />
7.	Weather</p>
<p>8.	Technical Outlook – charting NG futures and looking at indicators such as moving averages, convergence/divergence lines, resistance levels, etc.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/supply_and_demand.gif"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-101" src="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/supply_and_demand-300x284.gif" alt="" width="300" height="284" /></a></p>
<p>Generally, anything that causes supply to increase, while demand remains stable or decreases, will cause NG prices to decrease.  Anything that causes demand to increase, while supply remains stable or decreases, will cause NG prices to increase.  In short, NG prices decrease when there’s more supply than demand, and NG prices increase when there’s more demand than supply.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Fundamental-Table.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-97" src="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Fundamental-Table-300x149.png" alt="" width="300" height="149" /></a></p>
<p><strong>As of March 26th, the following fundamental(s) are bullish:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Power Generation </strong>
<ul>
<li>EIA forecasting a 2% increase in power demand for 2010, 1.5% increase in 2011</li>
<li>Coal fired generation giving way to NG fueled generation, cleaner burning fuel</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The following fundamentals are neutral:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Canadian Imports </strong>
<ul>
<li>YTD 2010/2009 increase of only 100k dth/day, demand due to extreme cold experienced this winter</li>
<li>Imports to remain depressed due to decreased Canadian production</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Weather </strong>
<ul>
<li>Despite below-normal temperatures of last couple of months, traders are looking past the end of heating season and towards to spring/summer periods</li>
<li>Above-normal temperatures expected for rest of March</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Industrial Demand </strong>
<ul>
<li>YTD 2010/2009 increase of only 200k dth/day (1.3%)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The following fundamentals are bearish:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>LNG Imports </strong>
<ul>
<li>Imports reached an all time high on Jan. 8 due to weather driven demand</li>
<li>Expected to rise 45%in 2010 due to new supplies from Russia, Yemen, Qatar, Indonesia, and Peru</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>NG Storage</strong>
<ul>
<li>As of March 25<sup>th</sup> storage report, total gas was at 1.626 trillion cubic feet, about 8.0%       above the five year average</li>
<li>11 bcf build was first injection of 2010</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Technical Outlook</strong>
<ul>
<li>Futures prices have       not been able to breach major resistance level of $6.10/MMBtu</li>
<li>Recently broke out       below resistance level of $5.00/MMBtu, then bounced off of $4.00/MMBtu       the week of March 22<sup>nd</sup>, finally falling into the $3.00/MMBtu       range on March 25<sup>th</sup> for the first time since September 2009</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Speculators (non-commercial, about 60% of trading volume) are net short futures</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>US Production</strong>
<ul>
<li>Total US gas rigs are only at 55% of the peak set in 2008, yet horizontal drilling rigs reached a new all-time record at 659</li>
<li>Production from shale gas formations has been able to offset production losses from conventional wells</li>
<li>NG production up 10.6% from 2007-2009, while consumption was down 1%</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Fundamental-See-saw.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-100" src="http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Fundamental-See-saw-300x184.png" alt="" width="341" height="209" /></a></p>
<p>In summary, there are more bearish factors than bullish.  According to the EIA, rising LNG supplies, modest consumption growth, and robust domestic production are likely to keep a lid on prices.  Simply stated:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Oversupply of natural gas + recession + minimal consumption growth = anchor on NG and electricity prices</p>
<p><strong>DISCLAIMER:  Past performance is not indicative of future results.  Electric prices are not 100% correlated to natural gas prices.  Geopolitical, economic, and weather related supply and demand spikes can significantly affect natural gas and electricity prices.</strong>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li><a href='http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/06/june-natural-gaselectricity-market-update/' title='June Natural Gas/Electricity Market Update'>June Natural Gas/Electricity Market Update</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/04/april-natural-gaselectricity-market-update/' title='April Natural Gas/Electricity Market Update'>April Natural Gas/Electricity Market Update</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/03/natural-gaselectricity-market-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which Demand Response Program is Right for Me?</title>
		<link>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/03/which-demand-response-program-is-right-for-me/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/03/which-demand-response-program-is-right-for-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Lembo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Demand Response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConEd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curtailment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYISO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the inception of Con Ed&#8217;s new Commercial System Relief Program (CSRP), many curtailment customers currently enrolled in the NYISO&#8217;s ICAP Special Case Resources Program (SCR) are wondering if they should make a switch.  We&#8217;ve crunched some numbers and wanted to share our findings. In the case below we ran the numbers for curtailment calls [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the inception of Con Ed&#8217;s new Commercial System Relief Program (CSRP), many curtailment customers currently enrolled in the NYISO&#8217;s ICAP Special Case Resources Program (SCR) are wondering if they should make a switch.  We&#8217;ve crunched some numbers and wanted to share our findings.<span id="more-153"></span> In the case below we ran the numbers for curtailment calls of 4 hours each and used last year&#8217;s (2009) pricing data.  Given the current direction of the capacity market, these figures represent the most extreme cases you&#8217;d find yourself in this year.  The most dramatic difference between these two programs is that the NYISO offers winter revenue while the Con Ed program does not.  If you&#8217;re using a Demand Response provider remember to account for their percentage of any net revenue, if applicable.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="600">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="col"></th>
<th scope="col">Con Ed (CSRP)</th>
<th scope="col">NYISO (SCR)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KW Reduction</td>
<td>500</td>
<td>500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Summer Term</td>
<td>Jun &#8211; Sep</td>
<td>May &#8211; Oct</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Winter Term</td>
<td>N/A</td>
<td>Nov &#8211; Apr</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Curtailment Calls</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Summer Revenue</td>
<td>$27,797</td>
<td>$26,695</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Winter Revenue</td>
<td>N/A</td>
<td>$13,105</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Net Revenue</strong></td>
<td><strong>$27,797</strong></td>
<td><strong>$39,800</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Of course, no two buildings are exactly alike, and this analysis doesn&#8217;t take into account the possibly severe penalties for missing a curtailment call.  If you&#8217;d like us to run a precise scenario for your specific building and curtailment level please <a href="http://energywatc-inc.com/contactus.php">contact us</a> and we&#8217;d be happy to help you figure out which program is right for you.
<ul class='related_post'>
<li><a href='http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/03/2010-demand-response-programs-overview/' title='2010 Demand Response Programs Overview'>2010 Demand Response Programs Overview</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.energywatch-inc.com/2010/03/which-demand-response-program-is-right-for-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
